08 May 2005

 

Antoun Sidhom The ever-present

Youssef Sidhom

 

 

On 2 May ten years ago, ++Watani++ lost its founder Antoun Sidhom, and Egypt lost a distinguished intellectual, a bold writer and prominent advocate of national unity. Throughout two decades—from 1975 to 1995—when Egypt and Egyptians were passing through hard times because of curtailed civil liberties and rights, sectarian violence, terrorism and extremism, as well as the abuse of Egyptian identity and national unity, Sidhom fearlessly wrote on the problems and crises which Egypt underwent.

 

Sidhom’s only weapon was his pen. He used it, through ++Watani++, to expose conspiracies woven against Egypt—whether those which originated from outside the country, those plotted by a fanatic few in Egypt, or by Egypt’s then executive and security authorities whose members sowed hate and disunion between Egyptians. Sidhom wrote with admirable courage and candour at a time when these attributes exacted a stiff price from the authorities, his sole objective being the benefit and safety of Egypt.

 

When Antoun Sidhom passed away, many files on the problems he tackled were yet open. And since it takes years in our country to admit ills and expose them, and more years to remedy them, a tour through Sidhom’s articles feels like a reading in

Egyptian contemporary problems. The values and principles he upheld are the same we advocate so strongly today.

 

Following are excerpts from his writings.

 

On the subject of national unity, Antoun Sidhom wrote in September 1977: “We Egyptians presented humanity with a civilisation which led to light, and gave humankind good, beauty, truth, and sublime values. It therefore befits us today to preserve our unity by defeating the irresponsible currents which attempt to assault our values and destroy our national pride. Throughout the years, our unity has been the symbol of our national struggle, has formed the foundation of our future, and the way to our Egyptian revival.”

 

In June 1986 he wrote: “Copts have always been strongly attached to their Muslim brothers and fellow citizens, bound to them with love and sympathy. Nothing but this fraternity can ever be the focal point of a dialogue between the two.”  And in March 1990 Sidhom wrote, addressing the same topic: “Egypt’s Copts need to exercise calm, wisdom, and peace. There can be no doubt of our Muslim brothers’ love for us. They are our own flesh and blood, and our relationship with them has always remained strong and robust, never weakening or waning. As for the few who assaulted us, may the good Lord forgive them, and guide us and them to what is right. We ask the Lord of peace to protect us and safeguard our dear homeland. Copts ought never to confront evil with evil or assault with assault. Love and peace have always been and will always remain their motto, and as such, they will always pray for their Muslim brothers and wish them good.”

 

In April 1990, Sidhom wrote on extremism and terrorism as follows. “What can we expect from young people who have been charged since childhood—through school books and teachers, mosques and radio preachers, as well as printed material brimming with insults against religions other than Islam—with hatred and disrespect of anything non-Islamic? The occasional sectarian outbursts are merely the natural outcome of such long-time charging. We should fill our children with the spirit of love and tolerance, revise our school curricula to sow the seeds of accepting the other, and weed hatred from our media material and religious address. Moreover, we ought to revise the social and economic conditions in our society, which lead young people to adopt violence and destruction.”

 

On the topic of religious conversion, Sidhom wrote in May 1978: “How easy for a person to convert to a religion other than his or hers, for the sake of escaping problems or obligations, or gaining social or tangible benefits. In many cases such a person finds ample encouragement from those who care nothing for true faith, and exploit religion to trifle with this country’s interest. The matter then departs entirely from faith, and enters the realm of farce. It goes to no religion’s credit to hold on to those who merely utilise it for their own advantage.”

 

As to the exclusion of Copts from official posts, Sidhom wrote in November 1990, and later in November 1991, referring to two consecutive groups of newly-appointed prosecutors and assistant prosecutors, where the proportion of Coptic appointees did not exceed 1.25 per cent. This, he wrote, was no isolated incident, but clearly represented a movement to exclude Copts from official posts, a movement which Sidhom asserted could never meet the approval of Egypt’s mainstream Muslims. Along the same line, Sidhom cited the figures nominated by the ruling National Democratic Party for parliamentary elections, all in all 440 candidates who included only two Copts.

The notorious Himayouni Edict which dates back to 1856, and the infamous Ten Conditions of al-Ezaby Pasha who was deputy interior minister in 1934, both of which govern the building and repair of churches, came under Antoun Sidhom’s fire in an editorial he wrote in February 1993. He questioned the reason why such outdated regulations should be exploited to humiliate Copts and curtail their basic right of freedom of worship. He bitterly asked if it was not time yet to abolish such legislation and replace it with a fair, unified law to govern the building and repair of all places of worship, for all Egyptians equally.

 

The day will surely come when Egypt would rid itself of all these ailments. All its sons and daughters will then join in building its renaissance. History will always retain a special niche for those great men and women who lit candles to light the way, and Antoun Sidhom will doubtless occupy one very prominent spot therein.

 

Your Comments